Практическое значение результатов популяционных исследований единственной артерии пуповины (обзор литературы)
Аннотация
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
Ю. В. ТрусовРоссия
Трусов Юрий Викторович, к.м.н., доцент кафедры акушерства и гинекологии
микрорайон Юбилейный, 100, Иркутск, 664079
В. А. Крамарский
Россия
Крамарский Владимир Александрович, д.м.н., профессор кафедры акушерства и гинекологии
микрорайон Юбилейный, 100, Иркутск, 664079
Список литературы
1. Heifetz S.A. Single umbilical artery. A statistical analysis of 237 autopsy cases and review of the literature. Perspectives in pediatric pathology. 1984; 8 (4): 345–378.
2. Murphy-Kaulbeck L. et al. Single umbilical artery risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010; 116 (4): 843–50.
3. Ebbing C. et al. Isolated single umbilical artery and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome and third stage of labor complications: A population-based study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2020; 99 (3): 374–380.
4. Fujikura T. Fused umbilical arteries near placental cord insertion. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2003; 188 (3): 765–767.
5. Benirschke K., Burton G.J., Baergen R.N. Pathology of the Human Placenta. Verlag-Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. 942 р.
6. Mailath-Pokorny M. et al. Isolated single umbilical artery: evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2015 Jan 1; 184: 80–3.
7. Gardosi J. et al. Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study. Bmj. 2005 (Nov 10); 331 (7525): 1113–7.
8. Monk А. et al. Perinatal deaths in Australia 2013–2014. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Canberra. 2016. 87 p.
9. Grivell R.M., Wong L., Bhatia V. Regimens of fetal surveillance for impaired fetal growth. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2012 (6). CD007113. pub3.
10. McCowan L.M., Figueras F., Anderson N.H. Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2018 Feb 1; 218 (2): S855–68.
11. Gardosi J. et al. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. Bmj. 2013; 346: f108.
12. Kehl S. еt al. Intrauterine growth restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-level, AWMF registry no. 015/080, October 2016). Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 2017 Nov; 77 (11): 1157–73.
13. DeVore G.R. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2015 Jul 1; 213 (1): 5–15.
14. Morales-Roselló J. еt al. Poor neonatal acid–base status in term fetuses with low cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015 Feb 1; 45 (2): 156–61.
15. Lees C. et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013 Oct; 42 (4): 400–8.
16. Fong K.W. et al. Prediction of perinatal outcome in fetuses suspected to have intrauterine growth restriction: Doppler US study of fetal cerebral, renal, and umbilical arteries. Radiology. 1999 Dec; 213 (3): 681–9.
17. Morales-Roselló J. et al. Changes in fetal Doppler indices as a marker of failure to reach growth potential at term. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014 Mar; 43 (3): 303–10.
18. Parra-Saavedra M. et al. Placental findings in late-onset SGA births without Doppler signs of placental insufficiency. Placenta. 2013 Dec 1; 34 (12): 1136–41.
19. Putri R.A, Amir R.I. EP19.14: Modified biophysical profile score and middle cerebral artery Doppler as predictor of perinatal outcome in Indonesian tertiary hospital. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019 Oct; 54: 355.
20. Ральникова А.Ю. и др. Органосохраняющее хирургическое лечение при предлежании плаценты и ее врастании в рубец на матке (клиническое наблюдение). Акушерство и гинекология Санкт-Петербурга. 2019; 3–4: 66–69.
21. Клинические рекомендации: профилактика, алгоритм ведения, анестезия и интенсивная терапия при послеродовых кровотечениях. 2019. 76 с.
22. Ebbing C. et al. Single umbilical artery and risk of congenital malformations: a population-based study in Norway. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019; May 27: 510–515.
23. Клинические рекомендации: атрезия пищевода у детей. Москва; 2016. 38 с.
24. Аверин В.И. и др. Аноректальные мальформации у детей (федеральные клинические рекомендации). Детская хирургия. 2015; 4: 29–35.
25. Бочков Н.П. и др. Клиническая генетика. Учебник. 4-е издание. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2018. 582 с.
Для цитирования:
Трусов Ю.В., Крамарский В.А. Практическое значение результатов популяционных исследований единственной артерии пуповины (обзор литературы). Акушерство и Гинекология Санкт-Петербурга. 2020;(1-2):11-17.
For citation:
Trusov Y.V., Kramarsky V.A. The practical significance of population studies single umbilical artery (literature review). Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Saint-Petersburg. 2020;(1-2):11-17. (In Russ.)